Skip to content

Remove the "pure" from "pure function" #12

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

mpw
Copy link

@mpw mpw commented Jan 2, 2019

The mapping from the state/model is not a pure function, so remove the word "pure".

https://www.reddit.com/r/reactjs/comments/abj7hn/uis_are_not_pure_functions_of_the_model_reactjs/ed1h20x/

"To elaborate a bit, React components aren’t always “pure” in strict FP sense of the word. They’re also not always functions (although we’re adding a stateful function API as a preferred alternative to classes soon). Support for local state and side effects is absolutely a core feature of React components and not something we avoid for “purity”.
I admit it’s confusing to see it described as “pure function” and I suggest you to read the documentation (https://reactjs.org) to get a sense of how React components tend to look."

mpw added 2 commits January 2, 2019 15:48
https://www.reddit.com/r/reactjs/comments/abj7hn/uis_are_not_pure_functions_of_the_model_reactjs/ed1h20x/

"To elaborate a bit, React components aren’t always “pure” in strict FP sense of the word. They’re also not always functions (although we’re adding a stateful function API as a preferred alternative to classes soon). Support for local state and side effects is absolutely a core feature of React components and not something we avoid for “purity"
Update Readme:  remove "pure" from pure function
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant